PhD Research Scholar·Economics, NHH Norwegian School of Economics
FAIR Centre for Empirical Labor Economics
Fields: Labour and Education Economics
marianne.godoy [at] nhh.no
I am a PhD Research Scholar at the Department of Economics at the Norwegian School of Economics, affiliated with the FAIR Centre for Empirical Labor Economics. My research lies in labour and education economics, asking how socioemotional skills shape the decisions that drive inequality and intergenerational poverty — from labour market attachment and educational choices to parenting and family formation — and how they interact with the policies that target these outcomes.
Before the PhD, I worked with international research teams and policy institutions across Norway, Chile, and Tanzania, contributing to large-scale field experiments, policy evaluations, and collaborations with government agencies. I hold an MSc in Applied Economics from FCFM and a BSc in Business Engineering from FEN, both at the University of Chile.
Examines how self-confidence shapes gendered sorting into competitive higher education in Chile. Supported by ANID/PIA Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence.
A field study of intergenerational transmission of character virtues in rural Tanzania, part of the Kizazi Kijacho RCT. Supported by the Templeton Foundation.
Field experiment in Chile evaluating the impact of a fintech app on workers' personal finances and wellbeing. With ACHS and CMF. Supported by SUSESO.
Field evidence on how communication framing shapes household behaviour during energy shortages. Working with Chile's Ministry of Energy, we designed and tested communication strategies in a large-scale field experiment. Supported by ISCI and ANID.
Amid escalating risks of energy shortages driven by climate change and sociopolitical instability, effective risk communication strategies are essential for fostering public cooperation in energy-saving initiatives. This study investigates how the design of energy risk communication campaigns can influence public response. Drawing on a behavioral decision framework, we conducted large-scale, randomized online experiments in the UK (N = 3,836) and Chile (N = 2,607) during periods of potential energy shortages. We tested four key factors influencing the impact of energy risk communication campaigns: the framing of the crisis's cause (local vs. global), the credibility and role of the message source, the emphasis on specific energy-saving actions, and the underlying motivations driving household actions (economic, environmental, or social). Our findings indicate that messages emphasizing locally controllable causes, such as domestic energy policies, can enhance willingness to save energy. In the UK, which is geographically closer to the Ukraine–Russia war, framing the cause of the crisis around the conflict also proves particularly effective. Government-sourced messages that highlight specific industry efforts to mitigate the crisis improve public perceptions of institutions. Campaigns focusing on high-impact energy-saving recommendations are more effective in encouraging commitment to saving energy than a mixed approach. Prosocial messages that frame energy saving as preventing blackouts increase risk awareness but do not outperform messages framed around saving money in terms of energy-saving intentions. These insights underscore the need for targeted, contextually relevant risk communication strategies and offer policymakers valuable guidance for improving public response and engagement in preparation for energy crises.
Address
NHH Norwegian School of Economics
Helleveien 30
5045 Bergen, Norway
marianne.godoy [at] nhh.no